何为民主?在线观看和下载

何为民主?(2018)

  • 豆瓣评分: 未知
  • 类型:纪录片
  • 语言:英语
  • 地区:加拿大
  • 片长:107分钟
佛系资源 暂时没有为您收集到播放资源!

《何为民主?》下载资源

《何为民主?》剧情内容介绍

《何为民主?》在线观看和下载

剧情内容介绍

何为民主?原名:What Is Democracy,

A vast, timely, and often chilling investigation into the idea and practice of democracy, ranging from Ancient Greece and Renaissance Europe to civil rights, fears of voter fraud, and the spectre of authoritarianism.

发布于2018年。并于2018-06-09(谢菲尔德电影节)公映的电影。

豆瓣评分未知,暂时没有评分,请继续等待。类型为纪录片的电影。创作于加拿大地区,具有英语语言版本。

何为民主?获奖情况

第18届温哥华影评人协会奖:最佳加拿大纪录片(提名)。

何为民主?资源介绍

佛系资源暂时没有为您收集到在线或者下载资源,我们将会努力的寻找,请您继续关注。

豆瓣评分未知,暂时没有评分,请继续等待。

何为民主?评论

..
西瓜 2019-11-07

Life is a ****. Democracy too. 西方国家们也还流淌在什么是**的挣扎中。

..
??? 2019-09-02

“count me in the crowd of holy fools” - holy hypocrites

..
proletaricat 2019-02-24

Extraordinary. The whole film is shot heavily through the framework of Wendy Brown's brilliant 2016 polemic Undoing the Demos, where she argues how neoliberalism eats away demos from within. The film rightly begins and ends with Greece and uses it prominently as a **** case for how the ideals of democracy match up with its contemporary reality. Taylor is strong in exploring structures of power in the form of racial&economic domination. One conspicuous weakness is migration debate and how this issue plays into global v. local debate. Brown's "constitutive we" appears weak in her telling but Taylor barely scratches surface. Is this a ****** case of free movement of capital but not of ppl?

..
Rina 2019-02-22

需要二刷。等源。一刷两点:1)democracy in the hands of a mass who is in ***** lacking of democratic cultivation and inclination is only going to degenerate into the tyranny of the majority; 2) the unreconcilable conflict between bounded democracy with the boundless capital and its whim

..
izzy 2019-02-04

這個問題問出來沒人可以給** 所以裡面受訪人都說的是某種現象 但是有幾個人成功混淆了我心中對**和****關係的看法 然後我想到小時候做題一旦做不出來的時候 就用排除法 反正體制也就是全民範圍裡大規模地找**吧 // 2020.2.15 - 我今天發現導演partner是jeff mangum 驚呆!

..
苏呜呜 2019-02-02

十年之后 Astra Taylor还是不知道自己想说什么; 虽然她的采访对象一如既往都说得相当好

..
** Jolie 2019-02-02

brattle 導演顯然是個youtuber!

..
面包面条面饼 2019-01-27

问题问得太大 基础不够扎实 到最后也没有独到的见解

..
无脊椎 2018-12-11

The historical discussions were **** interesting than the snippets from contemporary political life. Sample bias (let alone staged acting) is always a suspicion. Even the theoretical discussion was not meant to be complete. Rousseau's "positive *******" was praised, but its implications, as those eloquently argued by Hayek and Isaiah Berlin, were not adequately discussed in the movie.